Features and Specifications: Intel Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 7 5800X
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Header Cell — Column 0 | U.S. Price | Cores | Threads | P-Core Base/Boost | E-Core Base/Boost | TDP / PBP / MTP | DDR4-3200 | L3 Cache |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 9 5900X | $549 | 12P | 24 threads | 3.7 / 4.8 GHz | — | 105W | DDR4-3200 | 32MB (1×32) |
| Core i7-12700K / KF | $409 (K) — $384 (KF) | 8P + 4E | 12 Cores / 20 threads | 3.6 / 5.0 GHz | 2.7 / 3.8 GHz | 125W / 190W | DDR4-3200 / DDR5-4800 | 25MB |
| Ryzen 7 5800X | $449 (typ. $390) | 8P | 16 threads | 3.8 / 4.7 GHz | — | 105W | DDR4-3200 | 32MB |
Alder Lake combines big and fast Performance cores (P-cores) for latency-sensitive work with small and powerful Efficiency cores (E-cores) for background and multi-threaded workloads. As a result, Intel’s hybrid architecture brings what we would normally consider ‘odd’ thread arrangements. That’s because the P-cores are hyper-threaded, while the E-cores only have a single thread.
The Core i7-12700K lands with the same $409 pricing as the previous-gen Core i7-11700K, but it comes with 33% more threads. The Core i7-12700K has eight P-cores and four E-cores, for a total of 20 threads. The P-cores run at a 3.6 / 5.0 GHz base/boost, while the E-cores weigh in at 2.7 / 3.8 GHz. The chip is fed by 25MB of L3 cache and 12MB of L2.
The 12700K comes with the integrated UHD Graphics 770 engine with 32 EUs that run at a 300 MHz base and boost to 1,500 MHz, an advantage over the graphics-less Ryzen 9 5900X and 5800X. That means Intel wins by default if you don’t have a discrete graphics card. For a more direct comparison, you can look at Intel’s own Core i7-12700KF, an identical chip that lacks the in-built GPU, for $384. That $25 price reduction is tempting if you plan to use this chip for a gaming rig that doesn’t need integrated graphics — you’ll end up paying $65 less than the graphics-less Ryzen 7 5800X. None of these chips in the faceoff come with a bundled cooler, and the 12700K comes with 125W PBP (base) and 190W MTP (peak) power ratings.
The 12700K goes toe-to-toe with the 6-core, 12-thread Ryzen 5 5600X that has long been the favorite for enthusiasts because of its incredible blend of pricing and performance. These chips come with 65W and 105W TDP ratings, respectively, 32MB of L3 cache, and have only high-performance cores. Both chips support DDR4-3200 memory and the PCIe 4.0 interface.
All Alder Lake chips support DDR4-3200 or up to DDR5-4800 memory (odd DDR5 population rules apply). Alder Lake chips also expose up to 16 lanes of PCIe 5.0 and an additional four lanes of PCIe 4.0 from the chip for M.2 storage. Intel also added 12 lanes of PCIe 4.0 to its chipset (in addition to its 16 lanes of PCIe 3.0), and now offers a total of 28 lanes. Intel has also widened the DMI connection between the chip and the chipset, which now serves up twice the throughput. The increased DMI throughput is also beneficial for Z690’s bolstered connectivity options, like the new second USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 20 Gbps connection (other new features are listed here).
These new technologies add cost to the Z690 motherboards that house the chips, and DDR5 memory is largely unavailable. However, there are DDR4-powered Z690 options available. Intel hasn’t launched the value-centric B- and H-series chipsets yet, so platform pricing will be high for now. It is noteworthy that there is quite a pricing spread between the flagship and bottom-of-the-barrel Z690 options, but, as expected, prices are generally high this close to the launch.Winner: Intel
Intel’s chip pricing is an advantage. The Z690 platform also has a clear connectivity advantage: With DDR5 and PCIe 5.0 on the menu, AMD’s AM4 platform finds itself looking a bit long in the tooth, but Intel’s new features do make for more expensive motherboards. The lack of B- and H-series boards at launch doesn’t help matters, either. Additionally, DDR5 pricing is currently brutal, and we can expect that to continue for some time. Fortunately, the 12700K is just as fast with DDR4 in the majority of tasks.
Given its new hybrid architecture with two types of cores, Intel’s core counts aren’t directly comparable to AMD’s due to their different capabilities. Our performance results will dictate the value of the overall designs.
The Core i7-12700K comes with integrated graphics by default, though you can sacrifice those for a lower price point. Meanwhile, you’ll have to look to AMD’s Ryzen 7 5700G APU if you want integrated graphics, but that chip isn’t really directly comparable to the 12700K. That means Intel wins by default if you need an iGPU.
Платформа Whitley
Похожим образом происходит и обновление прошивок. Во время загрузки и после неё CPLD фактически контролирует ряд шин, включая SPI и SMBus, анализируя и фильтруя при необходимости их трафик. Таким образом можно избежать вмешательства в работу других компонентов: VRM, БП, бэкплейнов и т. д. А программируемость CPLD обеспечивает гибкость возможностей защиты для вендоров. Типичный и актуальный пример — контроль цепочки поставок, когда на заводе блокируется конфигурация железа и ПО, а разблокировка возможна только при вводе ключа, который передаётся уже конечному заказчику.
Прошивка CPLD и прочее ПО будут выложены в открытый доступ на GitHub под лицензией MIT, так что вендоры смогут свободно использовать её и подгонять под свои нужды. Правда, есть у этой медали и обратная сторона — PFR можно использовать не только для защиты платформы, но и для более жёсткой привязки конечного пользователя к решениям одного производителя. Хотя на первый взгляд это всё же более мягкий вариант, чем AMD PSB, где дозволено навсегда привязать CPU к железу конкретного вендора.
Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 (7390) pen and inking
Source: Windows Central (Image credit: Source: Windows Central)
Unfortunately, the (opens in new tab) is not included with the laptop, adding a $100 charge if you want to ink on the go.
The PN579X is a new multi-protocol pen that supports Bluetooth 4.2, MPP 1.51 (Microsoft Pen Protocol), Wacom AES 1.0, and the latest Wacom AES 2.0 technology. Those features make it a good investment for those frequently jumping between a Surface or other Wacom PCs.
The XPS 13 2-in-1 uses Wacom AES 2.0, which some would argue is superior to Microsoft’s N-trig based system found on the Surface line. The PN579X supports 4,096 levels of pressure sensitivity, 240Hz report rate, and tilt support for this laptop, which are top-of-the-line features.
Source: Windows Central (Image credit: Source: Windows Central)
There are three buttons — two near the front for quick actions and erasing – and one on top for assigned activities in Windows 10.
The pen has a flat magnetic side letting it stick easily to the right-hand side of the XPS 13 2-in-1. Those magnets are powerful, but the pen is still likely to get knocked off in a bag or just brushing the laptop with some force.
For power, the pen uses one AAAA battery (and is therefore not rechargeable), but it should last about one year with regular usage.
(opens in new tab)
Dell Premium Active Pen (PN579X)
A compact and portable pen that supports a wide range of protocols, so it’ll ink on your Dell laptop, your Wacom tablet, and your Surface 2-in-1.
Bottom point
You won’t go wrong with either of the Intel i7-11800H or the Ryzen 7 5800H processors in your next laptop. They’re very close in terms of overall performance, with only a slight advantage for the newer Intel CPU, but don’t forget we’ve tested these with SR memory, and upgrading to faster RAM might bring the two closer together. Again, that’s a topic for a future article.
The AMD platform has an edge over the Intel counterparts in overall efficiency, which translates in longer runtimes, overall lower power consumption, and lower temperatures, possibly corroborated with more reduced noise levels.
The Intel platform benefits from the higher CPU clocks, extra Cache memory, and some technology improvements, such as support for faster storage, Thunderbolt 4, Quick Sync, which might matter to some of you. You’re also going to find the Intel CPUs in a winder selection of laptops, including premium higher-tier models, while the AMD SKU selection remains more limited, even if it’s a lot better than in the past.
Of course, pricing will play a final role in your decision as well, and I expect the AMD configuration to have an edge here, as an older platform that might see more discounts than the more recent Tiger Lake models. In fact, as noted in the comments (thanks Bryan!), there’s a good chance you will be able to get a Ryzen 9 5900HX configuration for the same kind of money you’d be paying for an i7-11800H, at least for now, in mid-August 2021. That R9 should be a little closer in performance to the i7, thanks to the minimally higher clocks, but won’t make up for the platform improvements offered by the Intel Tiger Lake hardware over AMD’s Cezanne.
In the end, I’d also recommend looking past this Core i7-11800H vs Ryzen 7 5800H feud when choosing your next laptop, and consider all the other aspects that will influence your life with your computer, from the build quality to inputs and screens and everything else. We cover all those in our in-depth reviews, so make sure to check them out.
Преимущества
Причины выбрать AMD Ryzen 7 5800H
- Процессор новее, разница в датах выпуска 4 month(s)
- На 4 ядра больше, возможность запускать больше приложений одновременно: 8 vs 4
- На 8 потоков больше: 16 vs 8
- Примерно на 5% больше максимальная температура ядра: 105 °C vs 100C
- Более новый технологический процесс производства процессора позволяет его сделать более мощным, но с меньшим энергопотреблением: 7 nm vs 10 nm SuperFin
- Кэш L1 примерно на 33% больше, значит больше данных можно в нём сохранить для быстрого доступа
- Кэш L3 примерно на 33% больше, значит больше данных можно в нём сохранить для быстрого доступа
- Производительность в бенчмарке PassMark — Single thread mark примерно на 8% больше: 3073 vs 2858
- Производительность в бенчмарке PassMark — CPU mark в 2 раз(а) больше: 21335 vs 10482
- Производительность в бенчмарке 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score в 2.2 раз(а) больше: 9218 vs 4158
| Характеристики | |
| Дата выпуска | 12 Jan 2021 vs 2 Sep 2020 |
| Количество ядер | 8 vs 4 |
| Количество потоков | 16 vs 8 |
| Максимальная температура ядра | 105 °C vs 100C |
| Технологический процесс | 7 nm vs 10 nm SuperFin |
| Кэш 1-го уровня | 512 KB vs 384 KB |
| Кэш 3-го уровня | 16 MB vs 12 MB |
| Бенчмарки | |
| PassMark — Single thread mark | 3073 vs 2858 |
| PassMark — CPU mark | 21335 vs 10482 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike — Physics Score | 9218 vs 4158 |
Причины выбрать Intel Core i7-1165G7
- Примерно на 7% больше тактовая частота: 4.70 GHz vs 4.4 GHz
- Кэш L2 примерно на 25% больше, значит больше данных можно в нём сохранить для быстрого доступа
| Максимальная частота | 4.70 GHz vs 4.4 GHz |
| Кэш 2-го уровня | 5 MB vs 4 MB |
Ryzen 7 4800H vs. Core i7-10750H performance
Source: AMD (Image credit: Source: AMD)
AMD took a big step forward with its , especially the H-series chips reserved for gaming and design laptops. Built on a 7nm process, these CPUs pack a ton of performance while still hitting a 45W thermal design power (TDP). The Ryzen 7 4800H, which sits near the upper tier of the H-series options, has eight cores and 16 threads. It can handle a heavy load, whether you’re gaming or working with specialized design software.
Intel’s 10th Gen H-series CPUs are still using a 14nm process, with the Core i7-10750H having two fewer cores and four fewer threads than its AMD counterpart. You’re still going to get stronger single-core performance from the Intel chip, as well as a higher boost clock speed, but otherwise, the Ryzen 7 4800H should mostly surpass it.
Both CPUs include integrated graphics. AMD’s Radeon Vega 7 and Intel’s UHD Graphics 630 will both put up an intense fight if there’s no dedicated GPU available, though AMD will generally win out in this sector. Check out the following synthetic benchmarks to get a better idea of how performance compares.
Ice Lake Benchmarks: 1065G7 vs. 3700U
We ran benchmarks on both systems while fully charged and connected to their included power adapters, with Windows power options configured for maximum performance. We used the latest build of Windows 10 as of August 30, 2019, with all patches, updates, and firmware applied.
Our tests are broken down between processor-focused benchmarks and gaming tests. While neither system is advertised as a gaming powerhouse, Intel has touted the new Gen11 Iris Plus Graphics as a major improvement over its previous efforts, and for many users the GPU is the most important factor for Ice Lake overall.
Also, some tests factor in results for features such as storage speed, which are specific to each laptop’s configuration and not necessarily indicative of the potential of the two hardware platforms themselves. Again, this is not a review of these two specific laptops, but rather an initial look at how Ice Lake performance compares to its current AMD competitor.
Additional Features
Apart from its slim and compact design which makes it ultraportable, and it can be bent over many directions that’s why this notebook is highly and widely preferred for drawing, sketching, taking notes and many more.
Hence, its variable torque that enables the movement and working of the 360-degree hinges are a nice bonus.
The optional Dell Premium Active Pen that comes with it delivers precise pressure sensitivity (4096), tilt functionality for detail shading while drawing and low lag for the most natural, accurate stylus experience.
This is a 7.1-star electrical goods. So, the consumption of electricity in it is too less than other products.
This laptop has UV-resistant and stain resistant coatings.
The webcam of this product is 720p. The classy laptop comes with a conditional warranty of one year.
Ports & Connectivity
This classy unique laptop of dell offers two Thunderbolt 3 ports.
One MicroSD card reader, one 3.5 mm headphone or microphone combo jack is also present in this product of Dell and their quality is surely good.
But this product is still scant on ports and connectors.
The right amount of ports and connectors are extremely important to evaluate a notebook because ports and connectors play a very important role in computer networking.
Therefore, despite all its advantages, the lack of necessary ports and connectors surely poses a major drawback.
Naturally, a user might want to add a USB Type-C hub or a docking station to expand their ports.
For wireless connectivity, this laptop is equipped with inbuilt Bluetooth feature of version 5.0.
One can also find built in Intel Wi-Fi 6 in this PC.
Although this device provides plenty of updated wireless connectivity features, for wired connectivity it can’t offer too many USB ports, mainly for its compact size.
Overclocking: Intel Core i7-12700K vs Ryzen 9 5900X and Ryzen 7 5800X
Overclocking has become much more complex with the addition of a myriad of new knobs to turn, and much of that has to do with the shrinking frequency headroom. Due to fierce competition, both Intel and AMD have rolled more of their frequency headroom right into the stock settings over the last few years. Luckily for mid-range system builders, you tend to find the most headroom in the lower- to mid-range parts. Enthusiasts have also turned to wringing out extra performance from memory and fabrics as the companies expose more tuning knobs.
Both Intel and AMD expose a wealth of tunable parameters, along with sophisticated software overclocking utilities like XTU and Ryzen Master. Both companies also support per-core frequency and hyper-threading control (enable/disable) to help eke out more overclocking headroom.
Intel’s Dynamic Memory Boost adds a new wrinkle. This new tech works with both DDR4 and DDR5 and allows the system to dynamically switch between standard memory frequencies and timings and an XMP profile, meaning that it will auto-overclock the memory as needed based on the current usage pattern. And yes, this occurs while the operating system is running and doesn’t require a reboot — it’s a real-time dynamic adjustment. Intel also continues to support its existing mechanism for live memory timing adjustments from within the operating system, giving users a plethora of on-the-fly memory overclocking options.
Intel has long locked overclocking to its pricey K-series models, while AMD freely allows overclocking with all SKUs on almost any platform. However, we see signs of some improvement here from Intel, as it has now enabled memory overclocking on its B- and H-series chipsets with the 500-series chipsets, and it appears that the same policy will hold true with the 600 series.
AMD’s Ryzen 5000 chips come with innovative boost technology that largely consumes most of the available frequency headroom, so as we see with Intel’s flagship, there is precious little room for bleeding-edge clock rates. In fact, all-core overclocking with AMD’s chips is lackluster; you’re often better off using its auto-overclocking Precision Boost Overdrive 2 (PBO2) feature that boosts multi-threaded performance. AMD also has plenty of Curve Optimization features that leverage undervolting to increase boost activity.
Intel generally has higher attainable peak frequencies, while AMD’s more adaptive auto-overclocking tends to have less headroom. However, it’s always important to remember that chip quality can vary for both vendors, so the silicon lottery always comes into play.
Winner: Tie
Both platforms have a wealth of overclocking options for enthusiasts, their respective overclocking advantages, and a suite of both auto-overclocking and software utilities. However, there’s still room for a sizeable performance boost from overclocking the core, fabric, and memory, so this contest will often boil down to personal preference.
Тесты Intel Core i7-1165G7 против AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
Скорость в играх
Core i7-1165G7
53.5
Ryzen 7 5700U
59.6 (+11%)
Производительность в играх и подобных приложениях, согласно нашим тестам.
Наибольшее влияние на результат оказывает производительность 4 ядер, если они есть, и производительность на 1 ядро, поскольку большинство игр полноценно используют не более 4 ядер.
Также важна скорость кэшей и работы с оперативной памятью.
Скорость в офисном использовании
Core i7-1165G7
60.9
Ryzen 7 5700U
61 (+0%)
Производительность в повседневной работе, например, браузерах и офисных программах.
Наибольшее влияние на результат оказывает производительность 1 ядра, поскольку большинство подобных приложений использует лишь одно, игнорируя остальные.
Аналогичным образом многие профессиональные приложения, например различные CAD, игнорируют многопоточную производительность.
Скорость в тяжёлых приложениях
Core i7-1165G7
33
Ryzen 7 5700U
42.7 (+29%)
Производительность в ресурсоёмких задачах, загружающих максимум 8 ядер.
Наибольшее влияние на результат оказывает производительность всех ядер и их количество, поскольку большинство подобных приложений охотно используют все ядра и соответственно увеличивают скорость работы.
При этом отдельные промежутки работы могут быть требовательны к производительности одного-двух ядер, например, наложение фильтров в редакторе.
Данные получены из тестов пользователей, которые тестировали свои системы как в разгоне, так и без. Таким образом, вы видите усреднённые значения, соответствующие процессору.
CPU
Geekbench 5.0 Benchmarks (Higher is better)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Device | CPU | Single core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 | i7-1065G7 | 1,209 | 3,571 |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 | i9-9980HK | 1,176 | 7,624 |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7390 2-in-1 | i7-8565U | 1,111 | 2,965 |
| Dell Precision 3541 | i7-9750H | 1,117 | 4,720 |
Geekbench 4.0 Benchmarks (higher is better)
Swipe to scroll horizontally
| Device | CPU | Single core | Multi core |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dell XPS 13 2-in-1 7390 | i7-1065G7 | 5,459 | 19,097 |
| Razer Blade Stealth | Core i7-8565U | 5,139 | 16,339 |
| Huawei MateBook 14 | Core i7-8565U | 5,327 | 17,522 |
| Huawei MateBook 13 | Core i7-8565U | 5,336 | 17,062 |
| Huawei MateBook X Pro (new) | Core i7-8565U | 5,192 | 16,757 |
| Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | Core i7-8665U | 5,469 | 15,800 |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S940 | Core i7-8565U | 5,101 | 14,089 |
| HP Spectre x360 13t | Core i7-8565U | 5,056 | 14,767 |
| Surface Book 2 13 | i7-8650U | 4,862 | 14,694 |
| Surface Laptop 2 | Core i5-8250U | 4,203 | 13,233 |
| Lenovo Yoga C930 | Core i7-8550U | 4,787 | 15,028 |
| Dell XPS 13 (9370) | Core i7-8550U | 4,681 | 14,816 |
Производительность процессора
Мы начнем с производительности процессора, а затем перейдем к графическому процессору. Мы будем делать сравнения между Core i7-8705G и процессорами предыдущего поколения H-серии Intel, в частности Core i7-7700HQ и Core i7-8750H. Оба процессора составляют 45 Вт, аналогичные мощности, доступной для процессора 8705G; 7700HQ имеет те же четыре ядра, в то время как новый 8750H имеет 6 ядер.
Взглянув на Cinebench R15, мы видим, что в многопоточном тесте 8705G обладает достойным 8-процентным преимуществом производительности по сравнению с 7700HQ, используя его высокочастотные ядра в своих интересах. В однопоточном тесте он подталкивает эту маржу до 13 процентов, опять же благодаря лучшим импульсам повышения. Однако в многопоточном тесте доминирует 6-ядерный 8750H, как и ожидалось; с двумя дополнительными ядрами, процессор Coffee Lake на 46 процентов быстрее.
Это аналогичная история в тесте кодирования Handbrake x265. 8705G на 2 процента быстрее, чем 7700HQ, но получает отставание в размере 27 процентов против 8750H. Наличие этих дополнительных ядер в процессорах Intel нового поколения H действительно помогает в этих интенсивных тестах кодирования, тогда как Kaby Lake G, похоже застрял в технологии процессора последнего поколения.
В Microsoft Excel 8705G на 3 процента быстрее, чем 7700HQ, но падает на 33 процента по сравнению с 8750H. Опять же, это связано с тем, что 8750H имеет больше ядер, что является большим преимуществом в большинстве современных многопоточных рабочих нагрузок.
8705G имеет удобное преимущество в производительности в тестах сжатия и декомпрессии 7-Zip на 13 и 8 процентов соответственно. Однако еще раз, 8750H приходит и разбивает 8705G, достигая на 38 и 57 процентов больше производительности в этих тестах. Здесь есть довольно четкая тенденция, и это не та, которая благоприятствует Kaby Lake G над Coffee Lake H.
В смешанных рабочих нагрузках мы начинаем хорошо разбираться в том, как комбинация CPU и GPU складывается. При ускорении кодирования Premiere с эффектами Lumetri 8705G сильно конкурирует с игровыми ноутбуками, которые собирают более быстрые графические процессоры. Комбинация 7700HQ и GTX 1060 не наблюдается в тонких и легких ноутбуках, таких как Dell XPS 15 2-in-1, но Kaby Lake G здесь всего на 20 процентов медленнее.
Однако, несмотря на большую нагрузку на процессор, существует довольно четкая тенденция. 8705G немного отстает от Core i7-7700HQ благодаря слегка увеличенным тактовым частотам, но ему не хватает этих дополнительных ядер 8750H. Таким образом, 8750H часто по меньшей мере на 40 процентов быстрее в ключевых нагрузках, таких как рендеринг видео.
Intel Core i7-11800H vs AMD Ryzen 7 5800H benchmarks
As mentioned earlier, we’re looking at two identical test laptops here, one built on in Intel Core i7-11800H platform and the other on an AMD Ryzen 7 5800H. Both are bundled with 16 GB of single-rank dual-channel memory, SSD storage, and the exact same kind of RTX 3060 Laptop dGPUs, and both are the same chassis and almost the same thermal module design. So this is as much of an apples-to-apples comparison of these two processors as it can be.
Oh, and we’re also testing these with the same GeForce drivers and Asus software available in each case as of late July 2021.
So with that out of the way, we’ll first touch on the sustained CPU performance in the Cinebench loop test, which runs the same test for 15+ times in a loop, with 1-2 sec delay between each run.
We’re looking at similar performance between the two on the top Turbo profile, but 2-4% higher sustained scores on the AMD model, despite the fact that it runs at lower sustained power of 74+W, while the Intel model runs at 79+W. This allows the AMD unit to run slightly quieter, with the fans ramping up to 42-43 dB at head-level, while they ramp to 44-45 dB on the Intel models. The temperatures are the same in both cases, in the high-80s.
There are also quieter profiles available in both cases, but those we’re discussing in the A15 vs F15 review article.
We’ve also confirmed these findings in the more taxing Cinebench R23 test, in which case the CPUs ended running at the same 74+W and 79+W sustained TDPs, but in this case, the Intel CPU scored a little higher than the AMD.
The same happened in the 3DMark CPU profile test, where the Intel i7-11800H won over the AMD R7-5800H across the board, with up to 15% higher scores in some cases.
In fact, the i7 tends to win most of the benchmarks we ran on our review units, as you can see below. There was a higher capacity and faster SSD on the Intel model, which slightly impacted the scores in PassMark and PCMark, but not the others.
| TUF A15 – Ryzen 7 + 3060 | TUF F15 – Intel i7 + 3060 | |
| 3DMark 13 – Fire Strike | 17472 (Graphics – 18651, Physics – 23300, Combined – 9448) | 18651 (Graphics – 20538, Physics – 23509, Combined – 9331) |
| 3DMark 13 – Port Royal | 4411 | 4669 |
| 3DMark 13 – Time Spy | 7400 (Graphics – 7218, CPU – 8640) | 8066 (Graphics – 7869, CPU – 9406) |
| Handbrake 1.3.1 (4K to 1080p encode): | 39.78 average fps | 43.63 average fps |
| PassMark10 | 4894 (CPU: 22598 3D Graphics: 11571, Disk: 16661) | 3949 (CPU: 23081 3D Graphics: 13681, Disk: 18068) |
| PCMark 10 | 6668 (E – 10333, P – 9022, DCC – 8633) | 6799 (E – 10234, P – 8764, DCC – 9509) |
| GeekBench 5.3.1 64-bit | Single-Core: 1419, Multi-core: 7376 | Single-Core: 1545, Multi-core: 8107 |
| CineBench R15 (best run) | CPU 2176 cb, CPU Single Core 230 cb | CPU 2161 cb, CPU Single Core 227 cb |
| CineBench R20 (best run) | CPU 4901 cb, CPU Single Core 551 cb | CPU 5327 cb, CPU Single Core 572 cb |
| CineBench R23 (best run) | CPU 12668 cb, CPU Single Core 1395 cb | CPU 13226 cb, CPU Single Core 1494 cb |
| x265 HD Benchmark 64-bit | 29.34 fps | 29.48 fps |
We also ran some Workstation related loads, on the same Turbo profiles. The differences are small, but once more favor the Intel configuration.
| TUF A15 – Ryzen 7 + 3060 | TUF F15 – Intel i7 + 3060 | |
| Blender 2.90 – BMW Car scene- CPU Compute | 3m 22s | 3m 9s |
| Blender 2.90 – Classroom scene – CPU Compute | 9m 57s | 8m 46s |
| Blender 2.90 – Classroom scene – GPU, CUDA | 3m 37s | 2m 20s |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – 3DSMax | 71.67 | 83.33 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – Catia | 46.53 | 50.79 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – Creo | 66.1 | 83.89 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – Energy | 17.49 | 19.98 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – Maya | 210.33 | 243.02 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – Medical | 24.75 | 25.08 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – SNX | 15.25 | 15.97 |
| SPECviewerf 2020 – SW | 138.02 | 157.52 |
It’s very important to mention that both these TUF Gaming laptops are running on the exact same kind of memory, a 2x 8 GB kit of Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-2G2E2. This kit works in dual-channel but is also one of the newer Single Rank sets of memory, which we know it has a significant impact on some benchmarks and games.
I don’t have a set of Dual-Rank memory to test on these TUFs right now, but replacing the default memory would improve some of these scores and might even bring the Intel and AMD options closer in results.
I’m looking into further testing the impact of single and dual rank RAM on these two processors in a following article.
For now, though, this is what you should expect from the i7-11800H and the R7 5800H in terms of benchmarks and overall performance in a mid-range implementation with 2x 8 GB of single-rank memory.
Китай догоняет США
Китайский производитель процессоров Loongson готовится к выпуску нового процессора 3A6000, по своим возможностям сопоставимого с чипами компании AMD линейки Ryzen 5000. По данным портала Tom’s Hardware, премьера процессора состоится в первой половине 2023 г., пока без более точной даты.
Для Китая это очень значительный прорыв в «процессоростроении». Ryzen 5000 – это 7-нанометровые процессоры, которые AMD выпустила осенью 2020 г., и которые в настоящее время пользуются спросом во всем мире за счет сравнительно невысокой цены и одновременно хорошей производительности.
Таким образом, китайская Loongson по возможностям своих CPU отстает от AMD менее чем на три года. С одной стороны, это гигантский временной промежуток, с другой – AMD является одним из двух крупнейших игроков в сегментах настольных, мобильных и серверных процессоров, уступая по доле рынка лишь Intel. К тому же работа над чипами Loongson ведется с 2002 г., а AMD была основана в 1969 г.
Loongson развивается невероятно быстро
К слову, скорый выпуск 3A6000 – это повод задуматься еще и для Intel. Как пишет Tom’s Hardware, этот чип может оказаться на уровне Core 11 поколения образца сентября 2020 г., за месяц до премьеры Ryzen 5000. Intel до сих пор производит и продает их.
Design & Build
The 2-in-1 laptop of Dell presents itself with an aluminum hood. A glossy, silver Dell logo is present on it.
The variable torque within the laptop’s hinge enables its user to open the machine up with just one finger, while putting the laptop in a constant position.
Also, the Platinum Silver and the 360-degree hinges added quite a nice contrast to the pure white design.
The bezels on the 16:10 display are very pleasant as they are slim and bright just the right amount.
As a new standard updated product XPS 13, the 2-in-1 consists of a webcam on the top bezel. Check out best laptop brands.
There is also favorably a Windows Hello enabled fingerprint reader that is double in size of the power button.
Its weight being only 2.9 lbs makes it extremely sturdy and ultraportable. The display of this product is 13.4 inches.
It comes with edge-to-edge corning gorilla glass 5. This ultra HD plus WLED display has a resolution of 3840 x 2400 pixels.
It offers the touch screen facility and the display can be plugged out from the setup and can be used as a separate tab.
It offers a backlit Maglev keyboard, which gives a great tactile sensation. Along with a great touch pad, it has seamless glass integrated buttons.
